Comments on: Is Keith Briffa the Climategate whistleblower? http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower Dedicated to the Memory of Those Lost in the 911 Tragedy Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:10:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Richie http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4946 Richie Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:12:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4946 Fact: Man Made Global Warming is unproven Fact: There is no proven model for CO2's effect on global temperatures These dirty scientists have shown us that the warmers have no peer reviewed data to show that humans cause climate change or global warming! Moreover Climategate has shown that the so called scientists that purport warming have fudged the data, avoided disclosure, peer reviews and have made disgusting derogatory comments regarding the death of a fellow scientist. This proves that they are not only dishonest but really are a nasty bunch of people. But these alarmist ecoterrorists are just as bad as the dishonest lying nasty scientists that have done everything they can to fool the world! They are a disgrace and should be sentenced in the international criminal court for fraud and deception as they have cost the world billions of dollars in fake funding and driven policies that have/will cost billions of dollars! I am convinced that a hero scientist will come forward and lead us out of the global warming/ climate change quagmire perhaps he is Keith Briffa!<br><b>References : </b><br> Fact: Man Made Global Warming is unproven
Fact: There is no proven model for CO2’s effect on global temperatures

These dirty scientists have shown us that the warmers have no peer reviewed data to show that humans cause climate change or global warming! Moreover Climategate has shown that the so called scientists that purport warming have fudged the data, avoided disclosure, peer reviews and have made disgusting derogatory comments regarding the death of a fellow scientist. This proves that they are not only dishonest but really are a nasty bunch of people.

But these alarmist ecoterrorists are just as bad as the dishonest lying nasty scientists that have done everything they can to fool the world! They are a disgrace and should be sentenced in the international criminal court for fraud and deception as they have cost the world billions of dollars in fake funding and driven policies that have/will cost billions of dollars!

I am convinced that a hero scientist will come forward and lead us out of the global warming/ climate change quagmire perhaps he is Keith Briffa!
References :

]]> By: Ben O http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4945 Ben O Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:25:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4945 Whistle blowers usually are disgruntled insiders. I'm guessing some university IT administrator with a skeptical outlook, watching these warmist scientists pretending to be saving the world thinking to themselves, this is such a crock of sh!t. Most people don't have 10 years worth of emails sitting on a server. Going back that far usually involves getting data out of an achieve. If some hacker were to get a script that brute force guesses passwords - they're going to attract attention to themselves.<br><b>References : </b><br> Whistle blowers usually are disgruntled insiders. I’m guessing some university IT administrator with a skeptical outlook, watching these warmist scientists pretending to be saving the world thinking to themselves, this is such a crock of sh!t.

Most people don’t have 10 years worth of emails sitting on a server. Going back that far usually involves getting data out of an achieve.

If some hacker were to get a script that brute force guesses passwords – they’re going to attract attention to themselves.
References :

]]> By: say 'no' to stop signs http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4944 say 'no' to stop signs Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:58:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4944 "I originally thought Keith Briffa was one of the top masterminds of the alarmist mythology" How can you take these articles seriously?<br><b>References : </b><br> "I originally thought Keith Briffa was one of the top masterminds of the alarmist mythology"

How can you take these articles seriously?
References :

]]> By: Conservative http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4943 Conservative Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:35:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4943 Quoting Dana: "Briffa is a climate scientist..." Climate science? Is that where you carefully select trees whose rings fit your theory, but they don't REALLY fit the theory all that well, so the data (that've already been selected) are chopped yet again to, as they say, "hide the decline".<br><b>References : </b><br> Quoting Dana: "Briffa is a climate scientist…"

Climate science? Is that where you carefully select trees whose rings fit your theory, but they don’t REALLY fit the theory all that well, so the data (that’ve already been selected) are chopped yet again to, as they say, "hide the decline".
References :

]]> By: Moe http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4942 Moe Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:27:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4942 I know alarmist desperately want the method in which the emails were obtained to be the focus of the controversy but it's pretty clear that's not reality. Not that alarmist ever concerned themselves with reality before. The fact of the matter is emails reveal a group of unethical scientist bent on the continuation of there funding, conspired to discredit anyone or group that posed opposing views, and prevent the flow of scientific data to prevent their work from being scrutinized.<br><b>References : </b><br> I know alarmist desperately want the method in which the emails were obtained to be the focus of the controversy but it’s pretty clear that’s not reality. Not that alarmist ever concerned themselves with reality before.

The fact of the matter is emails reveal a group of unethical scientist bent on the continuation of there funding, conspired to discredit anyone or group that posed opposing views, and prevent the flow of scientific data to prevent their work from being scrutinized.
References :

]]> By: James E http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4941 James E Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:37:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4941 Could very well be as the released information was obviously very carefully selected to show the obviously criminal activities going on. After reading the original releases it was pretty obvious this was not a break in but a release of criminal activity by an insider who had become thoroughly disgusted with this criminal activity and wanted it made openly public for the entire world to see. From the intense effort being applied by the political left and the Rockefeller people the release has caused serious damage in many places to Davids attempt to seize control of the US government before his 100th birthday. I can see Obama being scrapped soon because compared to the best democrats even Palin is looking attractive and she is way to liberal mentally for my taste. Some scientific information revealing the truth about global warming, when it happened and what probably caused it. And as well how many years, centuries or millennia it might be before the world warms up again from the coming ice age. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:0Master_Past_20000yrs_temperatures_icecore_Vostok_150dpi.png http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/global_warming.html http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html http://reasonmclucus.tripod.com/CO2myth.html http://mc-computing.com/qs/Global_Warming/Atmospheric_Analysis.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variation Where the heat came from and why it was abnormally cold previously http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/research/global/215.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_minimum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum<br><b>References : </b><br> Could very well be as the released information was obviously very carefully selected to show the obviously criminal activities going on. After reading the original releases it was pretty obvious this was not a break in but a release of criminal activity by an insider who had become thoroughly disgusted with this criminal activity and wanted it made openly public for the entire world to see. From the intense effort being applied by the political left and the Rockefeller people the release has caused serious damage in many places to Davids attempt to seize control of the US government before his 100th birthday. I can see Obama being scrapped soon because compared to the best democrats even Palin is looking attractive and she is way to liberal mentally for my taste.

Some scientific information revealing the truth about global warming, when it happened and what probably caused it. And as well how many years, centuries or millennia it might be before the world warms up again from the coming ice age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:0Master_Past_20000yrs_temperatures_icecore_Vostok_150dpi.png
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/global_warming.html
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
http://reasonmclucus.tripod.com/CO2myth.html
http://mc-computing.com/qs/Global_Warming/Atmospheric_Analysis.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variation
Where the heat came from and why it was abnormally cold previously
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/research/global/215.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_minimum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
References :

]]> By: bestonnet_00 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4940 bestonnet_00 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:50:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4940 There was no whistle-blower, there was a script kiddie who simply stole a whole heap of e-mails (some of which went back a long time because there are people who keep their old e-mail, sometimes its because they want to be able to refer to what they wrote a long time ago), then had a look through them off-line and selected a few out of context that appeared to be bad when you misinterpret them. The way the information made its way to the world with realclimate being cracked is also pretty good evidence that there's at least one script kiddie involved in it anyway, a legitimate whistle-blower wouldn't have defaced a web site to release it.<br><b>References : </b><br> There was no whistle-blower, there was a script kiddie who simply stole a whole heap of e-mails (some of which went back a long time because there are people who keep their old e-mail, sometimes its because they want to be able to refer to what they wrote a long time ago), then had a look through them off-line and selected a few out of context that appeared to be bad when you misinterpret them.

The way the information made its way to the world with realclimate being cracked is also pretty good evidence that there’s at least one script kiddie involved in it anyway, a legitimate whistle-blower wouldn’t have defaced a web site to release it.
References :

]]> By: Dana1981, Master of Science http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower/comment-page-1#comment-4939 Dana1981, Master of Science Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:13:59 +0000 http://911truthcampaign.net/whistleblower/is-keith-briffa-the-climategate-whistleblower#comment-4939 No, frankly I think that's a pretty dumb theory. Briffa is a climate scientist, not a criminal. If he wanted for some reason to be a "whistleblower", he could easily do so publically instead of stealing people's emails like a common criminal. The stolen emails were released publically right before Copenhagen. Briffa has no motive to undermine the negotiations there - quite the opposite. If he were going to 'whistleblow', he would not do it right before Copenhagen. Nor would Briffa have any reason to attempt to hack into Canadian climate science institutions or Realclimate. I know deniers desperately want to believe that this criminal act was simply a concerned whistleblower, but it's pretty clear that's not reality. Not that deniers ever concerned themselves with reality before.<br><b>References : </b><br> No, frankly I think that’s a pretty dumb theory. Briffa is a climate scientist, not a criminal. If he wanted for some reason to be a "whistleblower", he could easily do so publically instead of stealing people’s emails like a common criminal.

The stolen emails were released publically right before Copenhagen. Briffa has no motive to undermine the negotiations there – quite the opposite. If he were going to ‘whistleblow’, he would not do it right before Copenhagen. Nor would Briffa have any reason to attempt to hack into Canadian climate science institutions or Realclimate.

I know deniers desperately want to believe that this criminal act was simply a concerned whistleblower, but it’s pretty clear that’s not reality. Not that deniers ever concerned themselves with reality before.
References :

]]>